Irked by the ruling of the Federal High Court which sentenced its leader, Nnamdi Kanu to life imprisonment, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has vowed to exposed the defects and contradictions of the judgement.
Spokesperson of the group,Emma Powerful who disclosed this in a public statement has also insisted that justice James Omotosho must explain the law under which he convicted Kanu.
His statement reads in part “The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) wishes to inform the global community, diplomatic missions, international media, and lovers of freedom that we shall, in the coming days and weeks, lay bare the fundamental defects, contradictions, and illegalities that define the recent ruling issued by Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja”.
The group maintained that Kanu was never found with any incriminating evidence of warfare except his fight for self determination yet convicted unjustly.
“For the avoidance of doubt, no gun, no grenade, no GPMG, no explosive, and no attack plan was ever found on Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. None.
No witness, civilian or military, ever testified before any court at any stage that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu committed any offence known to Nigerian or international law. This is an undeniable fact.
“The only thing the Nigerian government continues to criminalize is self-determination, a right guaranteed under:
Article 20 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights,
Article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and
Article 1 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). Self-determination is a protected right, not a crime.
Agitation is not terrorism, and requesting a referendum is not a weapon.
“Meanwhile, the politically manufactured insecurity in the South-East escalated while Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was in solitary confinement at the DSS facility, cut off from the outside world. No honest observer can attribute to him acts that occurred while he was physically incapable of involvement.
“It was Mazi Nnamdi Kanu who was attacked by the Nigerian military during Operation Python Dance.
It was IPOB family members who were massacred at Nkpor, Aba, Onitsha, Emene, and other locations.
Not one government officer or soldier has been held accountable for these atrocities. Yet the same system now seeks to convict the victim.
Rejecting the ruling,the group added
“Justice Omotosho has demonstrated, sadly, that he either cannot interpret or refuses to interpret simple English contained in Section 36(12) of the 1999 Constitution, which states clearly:
“A person shall not be convicted of a criminal offence unless that offence is defined and the penalty therefor is prescribed in a written law.”
This constitutional provision is short, simple, and unambiguous.
