Alleged $1m, £34,537 theft: Court admits Jude Okoye to N50m bail

An Ikeja Special Offences Court on Thursday admitted the former manager of P-Square, Jude Okoye, charged with stealing $1 million and £34,537, to N50 million bail.

An Ikeja Special Offences Court on Thursday admitted the former manager of P-Square, Jude Okoye, charged with stealing $1 million and £34,537, to N50 million bail.

Jude, the elder brother of Peter Okoye and Paul Okoye, is standing trial alongside his company, Northside Music Ltd., on a four-count charge bordering on theft.

The charge was preferred against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), to which he pleaded ‘not guilty’.

Justice Rahman Oshodi, while delivering his ruling on the bail application moved by Jude’s lead counsel, Mr Clement Onwuenwunor (SAN), said: “I have considered the affidavit evidence and oral application submitted by the parties.

“The singular issue for determination is whether or not the court should exercise its discretion in favour of the first defendant by granting him bail.

“Section 115 (2) of the ACJL confers the discretion of this court to grant bail in cases not punishable by death.

“I am therefore satisfied that the issue for determination of bail should be resolved in the defendant’s favour.”

He, therefore, admitted the defendant to bail in the sum of N50 million with two sureties in like sum.

Oshodi said the sureties should be gainfully employed and should show evidence of three years’ tax payment to the Lagos State Government.

He ordered that the defendant should submit his dual citizenship documents to the chief registrar of the court.

Oshodi also ordered the EFCC to notify the immigration office to withhold the defendant’s international passport pending the determination of the case.

Earlier, the defence counsel, while moving the bail application dated Feb.27, had prayed the court to admit the defendant to bail on a liberal basis.

Onwuenwunor argued that the defendant had been on administrative bail since the inception of the case with the EFCC and had not jumped bail.

According to him, the defendant owns 40 per cent of the family company, while the nominal complainant owns only 30 per cent.

Total
0
Shares
Related Posts